TheBuildersOfNinjago at 02:09, 3 February 2018

2018-02-03T02:09:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:09, 3 February 2018
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|}		\|}
	</div>		</div>


	<br />		<br />

			Oh yeah. To both the points you made. :P

TheBuildersOfNinjago: Created page with "
Wiz Ardon, the Peculiar Enchanter wrote:
TheBuildersOfNinjago wrote:
1 could arguable be ye and your. It isn't specified whethe..."

2018-02-03T02:08:54Z

Created page with "<div class="quote">Wiz Ardon, the Peculiar Enchanter wrote:<br /><div class="quote">TheBuildersOfNinjago wrote:<br />1 could arguable be ye and your. It isn't specified whethe..."

New page

<div class="quote">Wiz Ardon, the Peculiar Enchanter wrote:<br /><div class="quote">TheBuildersOfNinjago wrote:<br />1 could arguable be ye and your. It isn't specified whether he's speaking to one or more than one person. :P</div>

But if you've read PD or have some idea about what's going you should know it's

{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!<font face="Old English Text MT" size="3">Answers</font>
|-
|
plural, as he is taking to the Knight''s''. Sentences from PD have a context, so I thought I shouldn't copy whole paragraphs/chapters to make it more obvious whether it's plural or not. But you are incorrect about ye, as ye is nominative, while we want accusative here.
|}
</div>

<br />

Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28549248-20170304122637/@comment-29171447-20180203020854 - Revision history

TheBuildersOfNinjago at 02:09, 3 February 2018

TheBuildersOfNinjago: Created page with "Wiz Ardon, the Peculiar Enchanter wrote:TheBuildersOfNinjago wrote:1 could arguable be ye and your. It isn't specified whethe..."

TheBuildersOfNinjago: Created page with "
Wiz Ardon, the Peculiar Enchanter wrote:
TheBuildersOfNinjago wrote:
1 could arguable be ye and your. It isn't specified whethe..."